NETFLIX has reached an agreement to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery’s studios and HBO Max streaming operations for $83 billion at $27.75 per share, marking the streaming giant’s first major studio acquisition and triggering alarm across the theatrical exhibition industry. The deal, which requires U.S. regulatory approval, prompted producers to petition Congress with a warning that Netflix’s priorities differ from those of traditional studios, particularly in how and where films are made accessible to audiences, a shift they believe threatens the survival of movie theaters worldwide.
The fundamental threat to theatrical exhibition stems from Netflix’s subscription-based business model, which generates revenue exclusively from monthly subscriber fees.
The acquisition follows a weeks-long bidding war between Netflix, Paramount, and Comcast for Warner Bros. Discovery’s prized assets. The deal would hand Netflix control of one of Hollywood’s legendary studios, the HBO Max streaming platform, and content libraries spanning decades of theatrical filmmaking, from classic Warner Bros. productions to DC Universe superhero franchises.
Why Netflix has zero incentive for theaters
The fundamental threat to theatrical exhibition stems from Netflix’s subscription-based business model, which generates revenue exclusively from monthly subscriber fees. This creates a direct conflict with traditional theatrical distribution economics that producers highlighted in their congressional letter. Box office performance becomes a secondary metric for Netflix, since its financial outcomes are tied to subscriber retention rather than ticket-driven revenue. Worse, every week a Warner Bros. film plays exclusively in theaters represents a week Netflix subscribers cannot access that content on the platform they’re already paying for.
Warner Bros. has historically depended on theatrical windows to maximize film profitability before moving to secondary markets. Major tentpole releases generate billions in annual box office revenue, with theaters taking a percentage of ticket sales while studios collect the remainder. Any income generated through theatrical release accrues to studio accounting, not to the part of the company responsible for subscriber growth, creating an internal mismatch in how success is evaluated. Whether 10 million subscribers watch a new Warner Bros. release or 100 million do, Netflix’s gains materialize later, when the title enters the platform’s library and begins to influence subscriber engagement over time.
Your passion is film production. How and where to start? Learn from award winning producer Graham Ehlers Sheldon as he shares every step of the way on what it takes to produce quality content that people want to watch.
The timing imposed by theatrical windows can complicate Netflix’s effort to offer timely access, especially when marketing has already built audience awareness before the film reaches the platform. From a pure business logic perspective, Netflix maximizes subscriber satisfaction and minimizes churn by making Warner Bros. content available immediately on the platform rather than forcing subscribers to purchase separate movie tickets.
The timing of Netflix’s acquisition creates a stark paradox. Warner Bros. Discovery currently enjoys exceptional theatrical success, having released eight consecutive box office hits. Under Netflix ownership, this theatrical track record becomes strategically counterproductive. The more successful a Warner Bros. film performs theatrically, the longer Netflix must wait before offering it to subscribers. High-profile theatrical campaigns can boost awareness, but they also delay when that attention translates into viewership on Netflix’s platform.
Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos has repeatedly stated that theatrical distribution plays no role in the company’s business strategy. During earnings calls and industry events, Sarandos has declared that “driving folks to a theater is just not our business” and insisted theatrical exhibition remains “not our model.” These statements reflect Netflix’s fundamental philosophy that streaming represents the future of entertainment consumption, with theatrical release windows representing an outdated distribution model that artificially restricts content access.
The strategic question becomes whether Netflix will maintain Warner Bros.’ theatrical infrastructure, marketing expertise, and exhibitor relationships once existing contractual obligations expire. Netflix’s official statement mentions maintaining “current operations” and building on theatrical “strengths,” but this carefully worded commitment avoids guaranteeing long-term theatrical strategies beyond films already in production or contractually committed to theatrical release.
What theaters stand to lose
Movie theater operators face potential devastation if Netflix redirects Warner Bros. output away from theatrical distribution. Warner Bros. typically releases 15 to 20 major films annually, providing consistent content flow that theaters depend on to maintain attendance and revenue. These releases include tentpole franchises like DC Universe superhero films, mid-budget dramas, horror films, and comedies that collectively serve diverse audience demographics throughout the year.
The potential loss of Warner Bros.’ theatrical output would force theaters to rely more heavily on remaining studios for content. However, the industry has already contracted significantly since the streaming era began, with fewer mid-budget films receiving theatrical releases as studios focus on tentpole franchises or shift content directly to streaming platforms. Warner Bros.’ exit from traditional theatrical distribution would accelerate this contraction, potentially forcing theater closures that create cascading economic effects on surrounding businesses that depend on moviegoing traffic.
Regulatory scrutiny and industry opposition
The acquisition faces intense antitrust review from U.S. Department of Justice regulators and international authorities. Netflix already dominates global streaming with over 300 million subscribers across 190 countries, representing roughly 40% of the worldwide subscription streaming market. Adding HBO Max eliminates a major competitive streaming platform while concentrating enormous content libraries under single ownership.
Republican Representative Darrell Issa warned in a November letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and antitrust division leadership that consolidation would “diminish incentives to produce new content and major theatrical releases,” potentially “undermining opportunities for the full range of industry professionals both in front of and behind the camera.” The warning specifically identified reduced theatrical output as a key concern that regulators must address.
The Directors Guild of America announced it would meet with Netflix to discuss “significant concerns” about the acquisition, emphasizing that “a vibrant, competitive industry, one that fosters creativity and encourages genuine competition for talent, is essential to safeguarding the careers and creative rights of directors and their teams.” The guild’s intervention reflects filmmakers’ concerns about losing theatrical exhibition opportunities that have historically provided creative fulfillment and career advancement beyond streaming content production.
The Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition represents Netflix’s first purchase of a major studio in the company’s history, marking a dramatic strategic shift. Netflix built its entertainment empire by licensing content from traditional studios before developing original programming through production deals and wholly owned productions. The company disrupted Hollywood by proving audiences would embrace streaming-first content without theatrical releases, challenging the century-old model of theatrical windows preceding home video availability.
Acquiring Warner Bros. positions Netflix as both a streaming platform and a traditional studio, creating inherent conflicts between these business models. Warner Bros. operates a global theatrical distribution infrastructure, maintains relationships with exhibition chains, and employs marketing teams specialized in theatrical campaigns. Netflix operates none of this infrastructure and has historically viewed theatrical release windows as obstacles to subscriber satisfaction rather than revenue opportunities.
The $83 billion price tag represents Netflix’s largest acquisition by an enormous margin, requiring the company to take on substantial debt or issue significant stock to finance the transaction. This financial commitment suggests Netflix sees Warner Bros.’ content library, production facilities, and talent relationships as worth the regulatory headaches and integration challenges ahead. However, the investment only makes strategic sense if Netflix can successfully transition Warner Bros.’ theatrical business model to align with its streaming-first distribution philosophy.
The question remains whether Netflix will maintain Warner Bros.’ theatrical capabilities as a concession to regulators and filmmakers, or whether the streaming giant will systematically wind down theatrical operations once current obligations expire. The producers’ letter to Congress suggests that industry insiders believe Netflix will choose the latter path, eliminating theatrical windows to maximize streaming platform value at the expense of the exhibition industry’s survival.
Do you believe Netflix will maintain theatrical releases for Warner Bros. films, or will streaming economics inevitably kill movie theaters? How should regulators balance innovation against preserving theatrical cinema? Share your thoughts in the comments below.